I simply do not know whether the fact that the storm somehow managed to occur at just the right time to encounter colder weather coming from a different direction and at high tide on a full moon when the tide was even higher than normal could have been natural / influenced by sentient life forms / or even an act of the Divine. The inundation of the Subway made me ponder whether it could have been the target (this would seem odd!) - or was just 'collateral damage' which got in the way of a much deeper target... these being the subterranean caverns which I read about ages ago that were said to date from the time of Atlantis - and were possibly still used 'today' as a living area by those who rule from behind the scenes but wish to remain out of sight.
It will certainly be interesting to see what happens with respect of the US Presidential elections. Will they be delayed / rescheduled / cancelled? What if they go ahead but people in areas affected by the storm are unable to vote... and issue a legal challenge to the result? certainly these possibilities and the uncertainty could explain why different psychics and chanelled sources have said what amounts to diametrically opposite things about the likely outcome.
During my online trawls I saw something on the Cosmic Awareness forum which made me go "hmm", and "oh my goodness, its 9/11 again".
(message dated 27th October by armaugh, near bottom of page)
People may remember how it was announced (by Donald Rumsfield) on 10th September 2001 that a large sum of money ($2.3 TRILLION) had gone missing from the Pentagon. Well of course the financial records were said to be in the twin towers, and on the very next day these towers became the focus of global attention by becoming victims of aircraft strikes before they (plus an otherwise unscathed third tower) somehow managed to collapse into heaps of rubble.
The CA forum has a message which talks about a lawsuit which was filed last week in Brooklyn and seeks return of $43 TRILLION from banks to the United States Treasury.
A web search on "$43 trillion racketeering scheme" brings up more information... Of course I am not saying that these events are in any way connected. I am not involved and no-one has offered me any insider intel. But, rightly or wrongly by joining up the dots one must go "hmmm?????".
This first link includes a list of resources for readers to investigate and also says that after CNBC publically reported the lawsuit on their web site the children of a CNBC senior vice president were killed in suspicious circumstances.
Below I quote a little text copied from another web page.
Note that I am not a banker and only have a limited understanding of financial instruments and how bankers work and help (to embezzle?) the public, etc. Nevertheless, despite my very limited understanding of matters financial what I've read at the these links certainly looks 'interesting'.
The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.
In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws -- has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000.00) by the "Banksters" and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the "bailout programs" by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other "bailout money" advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress. Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the "Banksters" criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama's campaign from these same "Banksters" to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the "Bankster" Defendants.
Edited by simple simon, 30 October 2012 - 09:06 PM.