captain, on May 21 2009, 02:08 PM, said:
-Howdy Sweeps and all,
-Just back from the U.S. of A. Lots of Citizen Trouble Brewing that folks worldwide 'Don't know about'.
-On this Topic, you can bet your boots that the 'Private Militias' ARE watching this LATEST SIEZURE ATTEMPT by 'Obama'.
-Maybe American's could KEEP their own collected RAIN BARREL Water? Better not 'broadcast' this tip-or their NEW Fascist Governmet will close this 'Loop hole' too. Not a joke guys/gals. 
...Like that, & mighty fine to have you back.
Here's a good article...which should fire folks up/'S'
Is Barack Obama Crazy?
By Joseph Farah, editor and CEO of WorldNetDaily
'Is Barack Obama Crazy'? is a pretty provocative subject for an email.
I admit, I don't know the answer to the question.
But, given Barack Obama's actions in the first few months of his
administration, it's a valid question.
Let's examine some of the evidence:
If you held a job and people were questioning your qualifications, and all
you had to do to put an end to those questions, not to mention more than a
dozen lawsuits filed against you, was to produce a valid birth certificate
you claimed to possess, would you refuse to take that simple step? Or would
you, as Obama has done, spend at least $1 million to fight the lawsuits? I
think most people would agree that someone who chose the latter is either
crazy or doesn't have a valid birth certificate.
Let's say you got a job in which you succeeded someone with whom you
disagreed passionately…Would you try to have that person prosecuted over
those differences, knowing that some day, someone with whom you disagree
would succeed you and possibly contemplate the same course of action? That's
what Obama talked about doing in the case of his disagreement with George W.
Bush over the practice of coercive interrogations – policies, I might point
out, that were employed not just by his immediate predecessor, but by every
war-time president in the history of the United States.
Or what do you make of Obama's efforts to ban the use of the words "terror"
and "terrorism" from his administration's lexicon? The administration
prefers to call attacks on terrorists "overseas contingency operations." And
terrorist attacks at home are referred to as "man-caused disasters." These
new terms are apparently considered less offensive to terrorists.
While there are hundreds of thousands of U.S. Citizens voluntarily serving
in arms overseas, the Obama administration put out a report to law
enforcement agencies throughout the country to be wary of returning veterans
because they might be more inclined to get involved in "right-wing
extremist" activities.
Obama presides – legitimately or illegitimately, since WE the 'People' don't even know if he's a CITIZEN – over a nation founded on the ideals of
"independence" and "national sovereignty." Yet, in a speech
given in Prague, what was his prescription for making the world a better
place? "All nations must come together to build a stronger, global regime,"
he said.
How about his solution to an economic crisis spurred by too much
indebtedness? More debt.
Let's say you're the first black president. Do you appoint a black attorney
general who indicts the people who just elected you as a "nation of cowards"
on matters of race?
Imagine appointing to a top policy position at the Defense Department, a
columnist from the Los Angeles Times who believes U.S. Policies were to
blame for the 9/11 attacks by al-Qaida. That would be Rosa Brooks, who also
previously referred to Obama's immediate predecessor as "our torturer in
chief " and a "psychotic who need(S) treatment" while comparing Bush's
arguments for waging a war on terrorism to Adolf Hitler's use of political
propaganda.
I could go on, but I think you get the picture.
I don't know if any of these actions mean the president is crazy. But I do know they mean he is dangerous to the security and prosperity of the nation.
0
