Jump to content


* * * * - 1 votes

Obama & Friends... A History Of Radicalism-& Videos


25 replies to this topic

#1 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 August 2009 - 03:21 PM

OBAMA & FRIENDS… A HISTORY OF RADICALISM- MANY VIDEOS

-SEAN HANNITY'S 'SPECIAL' WAS NOT SHOWN-WE HAVE IT/'S'



*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…A 'Special' SHOW by Sean Hannity/'Fox News Channel', exposing OBAMA'S background/connections was suppose to have been aired…it was not.

It was entitled: 'Obama & Friends - A History Of Radicalism'

Soooo…To everyone who thought the special about Obama was going to be on
'Hannity's America'. It was taken off. Here are the segments. You better watch now before they are removed too.
This program was not aired so we Googled it, and found that the segments had been taken off of the internet as well. Wonder who did this HUH? Wonder who blocked this? Is this our NEW Government 'protecting' us? Here are the 6 video segments…if they haven't been removed before you get to them/'S'

*CLICK below on the 'My Website' Links…segments are in order/P1-P6-Thanks/'S'

Visit My Website

Visit My Website

Visit My Website

Visit My Website

Visit My Website

Visit My Website



#2 captain

    ADMINISTRATOR

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 416 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Epsilon Bootes

Posted 27 August 2009 - 02:00 PM

View Postskylark, on Aug 26 2009, 04:21 PM, said:

OBAMA & FRIENDS… A HISTORY OF RADICALISM- 6 VIDEOS

-SEAN HANNITY'S 'SPECIAL' WAS NOT SHOWN-WE HAVE IT/'S'



*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…A 'Special' SHOW by Sean Hannity/'Fox News Channel', exposing OBAMA'S background/connections was suppose to have been aired…it was not.

It was entitled: 'Obama & Friends - A History Of Radicalism'

Soooo…To everyone who thought the special about Obama was going to be on
'Hannity's America'. It was taken off. Here are the segments. You better watch now before they are removed too.
This program was not aired so we Googled it, and found that the segments had been taken off of the internet as well. Wonder who did this HUH? Wonder who blocked this? Is this our NEW Government 'protecting' us? Here are the 6 video segments…if they haven't been removed before you get to them/'S'

*CLICK below on the 'My Website' Links…segments are in order/P1-P6-Thanks/'S'

Visit My Website

Visit My Website

Visit My Website

Visit My Website

Visit My Website

Visit My Website


-Watched them all Sweeps-even though I am 'up' on all these things,
-I'm aware of many folks that have NEVER taken the time to find out these things. Most of my good friends DO know of these things-and find it 'hard going' among other people, trying to get this message across. People just, as you've said many times on Air, don't want to know. Pity!!
Below is a TV Ad against OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE/SOCIALISM. It was denied by several TV Networks-guess that tell a tale about 'informing the public'-Captain

Visit My Website



#3 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 August 2009 - 08:41 PM

View Postcaptain, on Aug 27 2009, 03:00 PM, said:

-Watched them all Sweeps-even though I am 'up' on all these things,
-I'm aware of many folks that have NEVER taken the time to find out these things. Most of my good friends DO know of these things-and find it 'hard going' among other people, trying to get this message across. People just, as you've said many times on Air, don't want to know. Pity!!
Below is a TV Ad against OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE/SOCIALISM. It was denied by several TV Networks-guess that tell a tale about 'informing the public'-Captain

Visit My Website


*Liked that 'Cap',
...We need more folks on board here with this topic interest. People really NEED to become acquainted with some of OBAMA'S background friends and the DANGER they pose to Liberty in the 'States'. Below is a selection on ACORN, and I consider it a must read for all. Thanks/'S'

ACORN -- the Association of Community Organizations for Reform... a publicly funded national organization is using your tax dollars to actively interfere with the Second Amendment exercise of gun rights in New Jersey and elsewhere.

ACORN went public with its gun control activism when it intervened in an unsuccessful attempt to defend Jersey City, New Jersey, a hot bed of anti-gun rights extremists, to disarm its citizens with a local gun control ordinance. ACORN pushed for stronger local gun restrictions that were already struck down by the New Jersey state court as a violation of state law.

Obama and ACORN's interest is in disarming law-abiding citizens.

It is an outrage that this group has intervened to defend an anti-gun ordinance that has already been declared illegal by the court. So long as ACORN accepts one penny of public funding, the organization should remain absolutely neutral on social issues, political campaigns and especially legal actions defending the right to keep and bear arms.

For the past few election cycles ACORN has clearly grown more partisan toward the radical political Left. ACORN'S PAC, in fact, endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for president, even though their tax-exempt status prohibits endorsement of political candidates. That's hardly surprising since he used to serve as their legal counsel and he taught the group about community organizing. ACORN and Obama are lockstep in seeking to destroy our Second Amendment rights.

We call upon the FBI to expand the scope of its ACORN investigation and focus on the group's involvement in the Jersey City case.

We support Ohio Congressman John Boehner's request that the White House immediately block all federal funding of ACORN activities until this group's questionable activities are fully investigated. We want to know how they are paying for attorneys, and why Seton Hall's Center for Social Justice and the Public Interest Law Center are providing legal assistance to ACORN for this effort.

ACORN has, since 1998, received an estimated $31 million in government funding. Yes, Obama knows a great deal about ACORN and its role in the bailout mess. He is a central figure in the left-wing ACORN exploitation of financial institutions to pressure them to make high risk loans. This IS the very same left-wing ACORN that was sued for voter fraud in our last presidential election.


Obama's presidential campaign paid more than $800,000 to a front of ACORN, currently under investigation in a dozen States for voter registration fraud and bribery schemes, for "get-out-the-vote-efforts";

Obama co-sponsored legislation called the "Helping Families Save their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2007"-- that was supported by ACORN and protects them from prosecution and any responsibility for causing the largest financial crisis since The Great Depression.

"Bad enough that ACORN is implicated in fraudulent activities in several states, but now an ACORN chapter in the Garden State is working against the ability of New Jersey gun owners to exercise a constitutionally protected individual civil right to own a handgun," said former NYPD detective, Sid Frances.

This is still the United States, not a socialist gulag. Public money should not be given to private organizations which then turn around and utilize that funding to usurp the electoral process and erode constitutionally guaranteed civil rights.

The fact that the federal government would even consider using ACORN as part of its 2010 Census to disenfranchise gun rights supporters is cause for Americans to be very concerned.


All that seems to be on the minds of Anti-Gun Obama and at the offices of gun control extremists is figuring out how to invade your privacy to erode and eventually destroy the right, and the means, of self-defense.


#4 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 September 2009 - 02:14 PM

View Postskylark, on Aug 29 2009, 09:41 PM, said:

*Liked that 'Cap',
...We need more folks on board here with this topic interest. People really NEED to become acquainted with some of OBAMA'S background friends and the DANGER they pose to Liberty in the 'States'. Below is a selection on ACORN, and I consider it a must read for all. Thanks/'S'

ACORN -- the Association of Community Organizations for Reform... a publicly funded national organization is using your tax dollars to actively interfere with the Second Amendment exercise of gun rights in New Jersey and elsewhere.

ACORN went public with its gun control activism when it intervened in an unsuccessful attempt to defend Jersey City, New Jersey, a hot bed of anti-gun rights extremists, to disarm its citizens with a local gun control ordinance. ACORN pushed for stronger local gun restrictions that were already struck down by the New Jersey state court as a violation of state law.

Obama and ACORN's interest is in disarming law-abiding citizens.

It is an outrage that this group has intervened to defend an anti-gun ordinance that has already been declared illegal by the court. So long as ACORN accepts one penny of public funding, the organization should remain absolutely neutral on social issues, political campaigns and especially legal actions defending the right to keep and bear arms.

For the past few election cycles ACORN has clearly grown more partisan toward the radical political Left. ACORN'S PAC, in fact, endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for president, even though their tax-exempt status prohibits endorsement of political candidates. That's hardly surprising since he used to serve as their legal counsel and he taught the group about community organizing. ACORN and Obama are lockstep in seeking to destroy our Second Amendment rights.

We call upon the FBI to expand the scope of its ACORN investigation and focus on the group's involvement in the Jersey City case.

We support Ohio Congressman John Boehner's request that the White House immediately block all federal funding of ACORN activities until this group's questionable activities are fully investigated. We want to know how they are paying for attorneys, and why Seton Hall's Center for Social Justice and the Public Interest Law Center are providing legal assistance to ACORN for this effort.

ACORN has, since 1998, received an estimated $31 million in government funding. Yes, Obama knows a great deal about ACORN and its role in the bailout mess. He is a central figure in the left-wing ACORN exploitation of financial institutions to pressure them to make high risk loans. This IS the very same left-wing ACORN that was sued for voter fraud in our last presidential election.


Obama's presidential campaign paid more than $800,000 to a front of ACORN, currently under investigation in a dozen States for voter registration fraud and bribery schemes, for "get-out-the-vote-efforts";

Obama co-sponsored legislation called the "Helping Families Save their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2007"-- that was supported by ACORN and protects them from prosecution and any responsibility for causing the largest financial crisis since The Great Depression.

"Bad enough that ACORN is implicated in fraudulent activities in several states, but now an ACORN chapter in the Garden State is working against the ability of New Jersey gun owners to exercise a constitutionally protected individual civil right to own a handgun," said former NYPD detective, Sid Frances.

This is still the United States, not a socialist gulag. Public money should not be given to private organizations which then turn around and utilize that funding to usurp the electoral process and erode constitutionally guaranteed civil rights.

The fact that the federal government would even consider using ACORN as part of its 2010 Census to disenfranchise gun rights supporters is cause for Americans to be very concerned.


All that seems to be on the minds of Anti-Gun Obama and at the offices of gun control extremists is figuring out how to invade your privacy to erode and eventually destroy the right, and the means, of self-defense.

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
...Well we've been talking in this topic about Obama's Radicalism, so we no bring you the Hidden Camera Exposure of ACORN...one of 'Obama's' Chief supporters/cum corrupt visage on the American scene. There are 2 Video clips in this Link. The Hidden Camera at an ACORN site catches a tax expert and a housing expert...advising a couple on how to 'get around' the tax laws, and how to buy a house of prostitution. Nice Huh? And Obama has a REAL History supporting and being supported by these law flouting people. Ain't NO Denying it. See for yourselves/'S'

*CLICK below & Scroll down...for these revealing videos...thanks/'S'

Visit My Website

ACORN CORRUPTION CAUGHT ON 'HIDDEN VIDEO CAMERA'


#5 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 14 September 2009 - 05:53 PM

And here is more about ACORN.



The ACORN Watch Report 09/11/09




* THE VIDEO: ACORN Baltimore Prostitution Investigation
* ACORN Officials Videotaped Telling 'Pimp,' 'Prostitute' How to Lie to IRS
* Voters need to bring identification to Utah ballot box
* State elections board probes possible 2007 voter fraud at Topsail, NC
* ACORN Continues to Make Headlines
* Inquiry opened into New Black Panther case
* Exclusive ACORN Exposé: Stealing Democracy

THE VIDEO: ACORN Baltimore Prostitution Investigation

Posted: 10 Sep 2009 10:18 AM PDT
Undercover investigation featuring prostitution, sex trafficking, tax evasion, and money laundering. Watch the videos here: Part 1 http://budurl.com/cmlw

(http://budurl.com/cmlw)Part

2 http://budurl.com/ag3f

(http://budurl.com/ag3f

)

ACORN Officials Videotaped Telling 'Pimp,' 'Prostitute' How to Lie to IRS

Posted: 10 Sep 2009 05:11 AM PDT
Officials with the controversial community organizing group ACORN were secretly videotaped offering to assist two individuals posing as a pimp and a prostitute, encouraging them to lie to the Internal Revenue Service and providing guidance on how to claim underage girls from South America as dependents.The videotape was to be made public Thursday on BigGovernment.com (http://biggovernment.com/

), a political blog launched by Andrew Breitbart as a companion site to his BigHollywood.breitbart.com

blog.In the videotape, made on July 24, James O'Keefe, a 25-year-old independent filmmaker, posed as a pimp with a 20-year-old woman named "Kenya" who posed as a prostitute while visiting ACORN's office in Baltimore. The couple told ACORN staffers they wanted to secure housing where the woman could continue to maintain a prostitution business.Continue reading this breaking story here: http://www.foxnews.c...,548827,00.html

(http://www.foxnews.c...,548827,00.html

)

Voters need to bring identification to Utah ballot box

Posted: 10 Sep 2009 04:26 AM PDT
ST. GEORGE - Poll workers might sound a little like patrol officers this year, but in the interest of voter protection, they're hoping not to offend when they tell voters, "I'm going to need to see some ID."With early voting already under way for this year's municipal primaries, voting officials are asking voters to remember their photo IDs, as required for the first time by state law.The Legislature passed a new statute this year that requires all voters to show an acceptable identification, which includes state-issued cards with photos such as a driver's license or passport. Two forms of other identification, which show a name and current address, may also be accepted.Continue reading here: http://www.thespectr...EWS01/909080317

(http://www.thespectr...EWS01/909080317

)

State elections board probes possible 2007 voter fraud at Topsail, NC

Posted: 10 Sep 2009 04:23 AM PDT
The N.C. Board of Elections is looking into possible voter fraud in the 2007 Topsail Beach Board of Commissioners election, state Rep. Carolyn Justice, R-Pender, says.The issue is one that has come up before on the resort island: legal residency of property owners.Justice said she had spoken with state elections Executive Director Gary Bartlett about the situation and was told the office would address it soon.“We talked about the situation of people getting other people who live outside the area but have a home at the beach changing their addresses so they could vote in an election,” Justice said. “He promised me that they would address the subject soon. He did not give me a specific time line. He said that he was very aware of it and they were going to address it.”Continue reading here: http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/2009...S/909089906/1...

(http://www.starnewso.../909089906/1...

)

ACORN Continues to Make Headlines

Posted: 10 Sep 2009 04:15 AM PDT
We need to give credit where credit is due. Today, the AP reports that acting under a tip from ACORN, authorities in Florida have arrested 11 individuals accused of falsifying hundreds of voter applications during a registration drive last year. According to the press report, "the suspects collectively turned in about 1,400 registration cards, of which 888 were later found to be faked." While this was certainly a smart move on ACORN’s part to assist in this criminal investigation, this controversial organization is far too often implicated in these falsified voter registration activities.In fact, over the years, ACORN and its employees have been the subject of investigations, indictments, and consent decrees in states all across the nation for election-related activities that run afoul of the law. Yet, since 1994, Congress has given it $53 million. And, legislation passed this year alone will make billions potentially available to this organization. Could Washington find no more worthy way to spend your money?Continue reading here: http://townhall.com/blog/g/9e887848-ebc4-4...f1-18f958c81389

(http://townhall.com/...f1-18f958c81389

)

Inquiry opened into New Black Panther case

Posted: 10 Sep 2009 04:12 AM PDT
The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility has begun an official inquiry into the dismissal in May of a civil complaint against the New Black Panther Party and two of its members who disrupted a Philadelphia polling place during the November general elections.The inquiry is disclosed in an Aug. 28 letter to Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee who first raised questions about the dismissal in May and asked unsuccessfully that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. make available the head of the department's Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division for a closed-door briefing on the decision.In the letter, Mary Patrice Brown, acting OPR counsel, told the veteran congressman from Texas that the office had "initiated an inquiry into the matter" and that it would "contact you with the results of our inquiry once it is completed." A copy of the letter was obtained by The Washington Times.Continue reading here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/s...y-opened-abou...

(http://www.washingto...-opened-abou...

)

Exclusive ACORN Exposé: Stealing Democracy

Posted: 10 Sep 2009 04:04 AM PDT
In the parallel universe occupied by many left-of-center Americans, the increasingly controversial Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) is a high-minded poor people’s group similar to crusading civil rights groups of the 1960s.They believe ACORN is a public-spirited organization that registers the poor to vote and encourages citizen involvement in morally uplifting projects and community development. They believe it spurs production of affordable housing, protects tenants’ rights, keeps unjustly exploited borrowers in their homes and rages against predatory lenders. They believe it fights for the rights of workers, immigrants and utility ratepayers.But it does so much more.Continue reading here: http://townhall.com/columnists/MatthewVadu...aling_democracy

(http://townhall.com/...exclusive_ac...

)
-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#6 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 14 September 2009 - 06:38 PM

ACORN Prostitution Scandal now spreading to New York.



Pimp and Hooker catch B'klyn Staff


http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brookly...s4YPEcsCcxLZhAE



'Pimp & hooker' catch B'klyn staff


By JEREMY OLSHAN

Last Updated: 8:19 AM, September 14, 2009

Posted: 3:30 AM, September 14, 2009
print
email
share

The scandal surrounding the left-wing activist organization ACORN has spread to New York, with employees at its Brooklyn office caught on video helping supposed ladies of the night get loans for their dream houses of ill repute.

Rather than reminding the women that prostitution is dangerous and illegal and advising them to change their careers, counselors at the social-services group shockingly offer suggestions on how they can launder their earnings.

'UNDERCOVER': James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles show off the not-so-subtle costumes they wore during their ACORN stings.
Sponsored Links


"Honesty is not going to get you the house," a loan counselor at the offices told two activists posing as a mortgage-seeking pimp and prostitute.

"You can't say what you do for a living."

VIDEO: PROSTITUTION SCANDAL AT ACORN
"When you buy the house with a back yard. You get a tin . . . and bury it down in there, and you put the money right in, and you put grass over it, and you don't tell a single soul but yourself where it is," she said.

Albert even had advice on protecting O'Keefe from getting tied by authorities to Giles' prostitution.

Her illegally obtained revenue could be given to O'Keefe through an intermediary, and then he could use it for a down payment on the house by applying for a "no doc" loan.

'UNDERCOVER': James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles show off the not-so-subtle costumes they wore during their ACORN stings.
Sponsored Links


In the earlier videos, counselors offered similar suggestions to a "prostitute," telling her to list her occupation as "performance artist," and even offering advice on how to claim as dependants underage girls recruited for the business.

Milagros Rivera, the Brooklyn office administrator advised Giles, "don't get caught -- it's against the law what you are doing, and there's a chance you'll get caught."

Before bidding them good luck, Albert offered two final suggestions.

"Save for a rainy day," she said. "And live well."

O'Keefe, who majored in philosophy at Rutgers University, said he and Giles funded the project themselves. This kind of undercover, guerrilla tactic is the "future of investigative journalism and political activism," he said.

Inspired by "Rules for Radicals," Saul Alinsky's bible for rabble-rousing, more often associated with the left, O'Keefe said he has been targeting and exposing the "absurdities of the enemy by employing their own rules and language."

"If you can make impossible demands on your enemy, you can destroy them," he said.

So he began using a hidden camera "in a location I'd rather not disclose" and started visiting ACORN offices around the Northeast.

As with a series of videos O'Keefe made in 2008, in which Planned Parenthood employees agreed to earmark his donations for the abortions of African-American babies, he said he expected ACORN would yield maybe "a few gotcha moments."

"But we never imagined they would all comply -- it's just disgusting they didn't just throw us out of the office," he said.

In a statement released Saturday, ACORN said that it could not defend the actions of its employees but that what O'Keefe and Giles did was criminal.

"And, in fact, a crime it was -- our lawyers believe a felony -- and we will be taking legal action against Fox and their co-conspirators," the statement said.

Fox News aired the Baltimore and Washington tapes.

O'Keefe said, "ACORN wants it both ways."

"You can't fire the employees and then say I have defamed them," he said.

jeremy.olshan @nypost.com

ACORN workers in two other cities, Baltimore and Washington, DC, had already fallen hooker, line and sinker for the hidden-camera sting operation by two conservative activists.

Four ACORN employees have been fired as a result of the earlier videos, and last Friday the Census Bureau severed its ties with the group, whose members had been hired to do canvassing during the 2010 census.

In an unrelated outrage, ACORN was accused of widespread voter fraud during the 2008 presidential election by helping unqualified voters to register.

As in prior videos released by the filmmaking team of James O'Keefe, 25, and Hannah Giles, 20, employees of the group -- which specializes in housing and voter activism -- were eager to dispense advice on gaming the system and skirting the law.

"You know, what goes on in the house we don't care," one counselor said. "We just help you with the mortgage."

O'Keefe and Giles were garishly dressed as a stereotypical pimp and prostitute. O'Keefe was decked out in excessively snazzy flesh-peddler couture, and Giles, going by the name "Eden," wore almost nothing.

The ACORN workers were not the slightest bit judgmental or put off by the request for help in getting financing for a brothel.

Counselor Volda Albert freely offered financial advice to the young couple, and held back on giving out any life advice.

"I can't tell you don't do it, because you won't listen to me," Albert said.

For tax and banking purposes, and to establish a legitimate income and credit history, Giles was told she needed to start saying she was a "freelancer."

"Don't say that you're a prostitute thing or whatever," she said.

Albert also suggested that Giles open two accounts at separate banks, depositing no more than $500 each a week to ensure few eyebrows are raised.

As for the rest of the money she earned from turning tricks, Albert told her to hide it away.

"When you buy the house with a back yard. You get a tin . . . and bury it down in there, and you put the money right in, and you put grass over it, and you don't tell a single soul but yourself where it is," she said.

Albert even had advice on protecting O'Keefe from getting tied by authorities to Giles' prostitution.

Her illegally obtained revenue could be given to O'Keefe through an intermediary, and then he could use it for a down payment on the house by applying for a "no doc" loan.
ehLhmL

-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#7 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 September 2009 - 08:39 PM

View PostYaeger, on Sep 14 2009, 07:38 PM, said:

ACORN Prostitution Scandal now spreading to New York.



Pimp and Hooker catch B'klyn Staff


http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brookly...s4YPEcsCcxLZhAE



'Pimp & hooker' catch B'klyn staff


By JEREMY OLSHAN

Last Updated: 8:19 AM, September 14, 2009

Posted: 3:30 AM, September 14, 2009
print
email
share

The scandal surrounding the left-wing activist organization ACORN has spread to New York, with employees at its Brooklyn office caught on video helping supposed ladies of the night get loans for their dream houses of ill repute.

Rather than reminding the women that prostitution is dangerous and illegal and advising them to change their careers, counselors at the social-services group shockingly offer suggestions on how they can launder their earnings.

'UNDERCOVER': James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles show off the not-so-subtle costumes they wore during their ACORN stings.
Sponsored Links


"Honesty is not going to get you the house," a loan counselor at the offices told two activists posing as a mortgage-seeking pimp and prostitute.

"You can't say what you do for a living."

VIDEO: PROSTITUTION SCANDAL AT ACORN
"When you buy the house with a back yard. You get a tin . . . and bury it down in there, and you put the money right in, and you put grass over it, and you don't tell a single soul but yourself where it is," she said.

Albert even had advice on protecting O'Keefe from getting tied by authorities to Giles' prostitution.

Her illegally obtained revenue could be given to O'Keefe through an intermediary, and then he could use it for a down payment on the house by applying for a "no doc" loan.

'UNDERCOVER': James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles show off the not-so-subtle costumes they wore during their ACORN stings.
Sponsored Links


In the earlier videos, counselors offered similar suggestions to a "prostitute," telling her to list her occupation as "performance artist," and even offering advice on how to claim as dependants underage girls recruited for the business.

Milagros Rivera, the Brooklyn office administrator advised Giles, "don't get caught -- it's against the law what you are doing, and there's a chance you'll get caught."

Before bidding them good luck, Albert offered two final suggestions.

"Save for a rainy day," she said. "And live well."

O'Keefe, who majored in philosophy at Rutgers University, said he and Giles funded the project themselves. This kind of undercover, guerrilla tactic is the "future of investigative journalism and political activism," he said.

Inspired by "Rules for Radicals," Saul Alinsky's bible for rabble-rousing, more often associated with the left, O'Keefe said he has been targeting and exposing the "absurdities of the enemy by employing their own rules and language."

"If you can make impossible demands on your enemy, you can destroy them," he said.

So he began using a hidden camera "in a location I'd rather not disclose" and started visiting ACORN offices around the Northeast.

As with a series of videos O'Keefe made in 2008, in which Planned Parenthood employees agreed to earmark his donations for the abortions of African-American babies, he said he expected ACORN would yield maybe "a few gotcha moments."

"But we never imagined they would all comply -- it's just disgusting they didn't just throw us out of the office," he said.

In a statement released Saturday, ACORN said that it could not defend the actions of its employees but that what O'Keefe and Giles did was criminal.

"And, in fact, a crime it was -- our lawyers believe a felony -- and we will be taking legal action against Fox and their co-conspirators," the statement said.

Fox News aired the Baltimore and Washington tapes.

O'Keefe said, "ACORN wants it both ways."

"You can't fire the employees and then say I have defamed them," he said.

jeremy.olshan @nypost.com

ACORN workers in two other cities, Baltimore and Washington, DC, had already fallen hooker, line and sinker for the hidden-camera sting operation by two conservative activists.

Four ACORN employees have been fired as a result of the earlier videos, and last Friday the Census Bureau severed its ties with the group, whose members had been hired to do canvassing during the 2010 census.

In an unrelated outrage, ACORN was accused of widespread voter fraud during the 2008 presidential election by helping unqualified voters to register.

As in prior videos released by the filmmaking team of James O'Keefe, 25, and Hannah Giles, 20, employees of the group -- which specializes in housing and voter activism -- were eager to dispense advice on gaming the system and skirting the law.

"You know, what goes on in the house we don't care," one counselor said. "We just help you with the mortgage."

O'Keefe and Giles were garishly dressed as a stereotypical pimp and prostitute. O'Keefe was decked out in excessively snazzy flesh-peddler couture, and Giles, going by the name "Eden," wore almost nothing.

The ACORN workers were not the slightest bit judgmental or put off by the request for help in getting financing for a brothel.

Counselor Volda Albert freely offered financial advice to the young couple, and held back on giving out any life advice.

"I can't tell you don't do it, because you won't listen to me," Albert said.

For tax and banking purposes, and to establish a legitimate income and credit history, Giles was told she needed to start saying she was a "freelancer."

"Don't say that you're a prostitute thing or whatever," she said.

Albert also suggested that Giles open two accounts at separate banks, depositing no more than $500 each a week to ensure few eyebrows are raised.

As for the rest of the money she earned from turning tricks, Albert told her to hide it away.

"When you buy the house with a back yard. You get a tin . . . and bury it down in there, and you put the money right in, and you put grass over it, and you don't tell a single soul but yourself where it is," she said.

Albert even had advice on protecting O'Keefe from getting tied by authorities to Giles' prostitution.

Her illegally obtained revenue could be given to O'Keefe through an intermediary, and then he could use it for a down payment on the house by applying for a "no doc" loan.
ehLhmL

*YEP Yaeger...got that right/'S'

*'Sweeps' NOTE:

…The following is VERY interesting folks. What politician doesn't LIE? Well with Obama…it's a certainty. Read the text below. Get the feel. Thanks/'S'

Congressman shouts 'you lie' during Obama's speech. Was he right?
Congressman Joe Wilson (R-SC) issued an apology after his outburst, "you lie," toward President Obama during his health care speech to Congress on Wednesday. "I let my emotions get the best of me," Wilson said in a statement. "I extend sincere apologies to the president." We commend Wilson for his quick humility. But questions remain:

Did Obama tell lies during the speech? Was Wilson right after all? And why doesn't Obama apologize just as quickly for calling conservatives liars? In their fact-checking, the press confirmed FIVE WHOPPERS told by the President himself:

OBAMA LIE #1: "No federal dollars will be used to fund abortions."

THE TRUTH: The Capps Amendment to HR 3200 has a Section 4B that reads: "Abortions for Which Public Funding Is Allowed. -- The services described in this subparagraph are abortions for which the expenditure of Federal funds appropriated for the Department of Health and Human Services is permitted." The Washington Times reported: "You can't get more explicit than that." And FactCheck.org exposed Obama's lie too: "Despite what Obama said, the House bill would allow abortions to be covered by a federal plan and by federally subsidized private plans." So President Obama lied, plain and simple.

OBAMA LIE #2: "I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits either now or in the future. Period."

THE TRUTH: The Democrat controlled Congressional Budget Office said Obamacare would add $220 billion to the deficit over 10 years, but will not succeed at shrinking the overall costs of our nation's health care. Republicans claim it's more like $600 billion increased deficit spending. (Confirmed by Associated Press, 9 Sep 09.) Either way, Obama lied.

OBAMA LIE #3: "Don't pay attention to those scary stories about how your benefits will be cut...That will never happen on my watch. I will protect Medicare."

THE TRUTH: The Washington Post reports Obama proposes "to squeeze more than $500 billion out of the growth of Medicare over the next decade....[which has] fueled fears that his effort to expand coverage to millions of younger, uninsured Americans will damage elder care. As a result, barely one-third of seniors support a health-care overhaul, several polls found." (Washington Post, 9 Aug 09) Even the Post admits, Obama lied.

OBAMA LIE #4: "If you lose your job or change your job, you will be able to get coverage."

THE TRUTH: Whether working or not, rich or poor, you will be ordered to get mandatory government-run health-care coverage, or pay a fine a $3800 fine per family, under the new Senate plan being railroaded through the finance committee by Max Baucus (D-MT). (New York Times, 9 Sep 09). Obama pretends you're "able" to get coverage, when he knows it's mandatory (with a big tax increase or "fine" penalty). Obama lied. But the biggest of all...

OBAMA LIE #5: "The claim, made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens, such a charge would be laughable if it weren't so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple."

THE TRUTH: Mandatory "end of life" counseling in HR 3200 "shall" include counseling every 5 years to the elderly, giving doctors a monetary incentive to persuade you to sign a "do not resuscitate" (DNR) order to pull the plug on Grandma, just like the Obama administration already pressures all Veterans to sign them. (Confirmed by the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, read extensive details at PrayInJesusName.org.) And under the British NHS government-run health plan, "Patients with terminal illnesses are being made to die prematurely under an NHS scheme to help end their lives, leading doctors have warned." (The Daily Telegraph, 2 Sep 09). Dr. Ewing Cook just admitted intentionally killing patients who signed DNR authorizations during Hurricane Katrina. "I gave her medicine so I could get rid of her faster…there's no question I hastened her demise." Bottom line: Grandma, don't sign Obama's DNR order, even if your doctor gets a bonus check from the President for talking you into that.

Obama lied at least five times during his speech. Congressman Wilson was right after all.


#8 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 15 September 2009 - 09:49 AM

Joe Wilson's one and only mistake was that he apologized to Saint Barry the anointed one. Posted Image
-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#9 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 15 September 2009 - 10:38 AM

These latest ACORN scandals involving allegations of prostitution come as no surprise to me. The Democratic Party has a long standing history of moral decay.
To get a better understanding of the situation we have to take a closer look at Barack Hussein Obama's own sexual encounters with gay men involving purchase and use of illegal drugs. Larry Sinclair (watch video below) is only the tip of an iceberg.





Then there was Bill Clinton. While still a governor, everybody in Little Rock knew that he had an addiction to pornography and had a string of prostitutes (sometimes two or more at a time) visiting him at his home. Of course the media and the liberals dismissed these claims as "right wing lies", as they do in the case of the homosexual and crack-cocaine using skeletons in Barack Hussein Obama's closet.
Considering all this, I am not surprised at all about what going on with ACORN.

Edited by skylark, 15 September 2009 - 02:23 PM.

-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#10 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 October 2009 - 09:45 AM

View PostYaeger, on Sep 15 2009, 11:38 AM, said:

These latest ACORN scandals involving allegations of prostitution come as no surprise to me. The Democratic Party has a long standing history of moral decay.
To get a better understanding of the situation we have to take a closer look at Barack Hussein Obama's own sexual encounters with gay men involving purchase and use of illegal drugs. Larry Sinclair (watch video below) is only the tip of an iceberg.





Then there was Bill Clinton. While still a governor, everybody in Little Rock knew that he had an addiction to pornography and had a string of prostitutes (sometimes two or more at a time) visiting him at his home. Of course the media and the liberals dismissed these claims as "right wing lies", as they do in the case of the homosexual and crack-cocaine using skeletons in Barack Hussein Obama's closet.
Considering all this, I am not surprised at all about what going on with ACORN.

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…Listing below only part of the Obama 'fluffs' and Anti-American/Un-Presidential spirit now in the White House. Face to face…I'd tell him 'I'll take my freedoms, you take the 'change'. 'Up yours' would be suitable also/'S'

Obama's First Six Months' Accomplishments:

01. Offended the Queen of England.

02. Bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia.

03. Praised the Marxist Daniel Ortega.

04. Kissed Socialist Hugo Chavez on the cheek.

05. Endorsed the Socialist Evo Morales of Bolivia.

06. Sided with Hugo Chavez and Communist Fidel Castro against Honduras.

07. Announced we would meet with Iranians with no pre-conditions
while they're building their nuclear weapons.

08. Gave away billions to AIG also without pre-conditions.

09. Expanded the bailouts.

10. Insulted everyone who has ever loved a Special Olympian.

11. Doubled our national debt.

12. Announced the termination of our new missile defense system
the day after North Korea launched an ICBM.

13. Released information on U.S. intelligence gathering despite
urgings of his own CIA director and the prior four CIA directors.

14. Accepted without comment that five of his cabinet members
cheated on their taxes and two other nominees withdrew after
they couldn't take the heat.

15. Appointed a Homeland Security Chief who identified military
veterans and abortion opponents as "dangers to the nation."

16. Ordered that the word "terrorism" no longer be used and
instead refers to such acts as "man made disasters."

17. Circled the globe to publicly apologize for America 's world leadership.

18. Told the Mexican president that the violence in their country
was because of us.

19. Politicized the census by moving it into the White House from
the Department of Commerce.

20. Appointed as Attorney General the man who orchestrated the
forced removal and expulsion to Cuba of a 9-year-old whose
mother died trying to bring him to freedom in the United States.

21. Salutes as heroes three Navy SEALS who took down three
terrorists who threatened one American life and the next day
announces members of the Bush administration may stand trial
for "torturing" three 9/11 terrorists by pouring water up their noses.

22. Low altitude photo shoot of Air Force One over New York City
that frightened thousands of New Yorkers.

23. Sent his National Defense Advisor to Europe to assure them
that the US will no longer treat Israel in a special manner and
they might be on their own with the Muslims.

24. Praised Jimmy Carter's trip to Gaza where he sided with
terrorist Hamas against Israel.

25. Nationalized General Motors and Chrysler while turning
shareholder control over to the unions and freezing out retired
investors who owned their bonds. Committed unlimited taxpayer
billions in the process.

26. Passed a huge energy tax in the House that will make American
industry even less competitive while costing homeowners thousands per year.

27. Announced nationalized health care "reform" that will strip
seniors of their Medicare, cut pay of physicians, increase taxes
yet another $1 trillion, and put everyone on rationed care with
government bureaucrats deciding who gets care and who doesn't.

Bloomberg: Daschle says, "Health care reform will not be pain
free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that
come with age instead of treating them", while former Colorado
Governor Dick Lamm says seniors have "a duty to die."

If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that
the President, Senators and Congressmen have their own special
gold plated health care plan which is guaranteed the remainder
of their lives and they are not subject to this new law if
they pass it.

For those of you who do not follow politics, there is a list equally
long and full of more great ideas that are coming your way. Maybe there
is a reason that 'people hate change'!


#11 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 08 October 2009 - 11:08 PM

View Postskylark, on Oct 4 2009, 10:45 AM, said:

*'Sweeps' NOTE:

04. Kissed Socialist Hugo Chavez on the cheek.

What else could one expect from a closet bi-sexual ?!?

Obama sleeps with men (see Larry Sinclair) and women. But he prefers to pimp women. Go to youtube.com and search for 'Obama Girl'. A young woman singing and dancing with Obama's name written on her private parts. What type of a man would have his name written on a woman's private parts? Exactly, a pimp! Barack Hussein Obama is a long legged mack daddy!!!
-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#12 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 09 October 2009 - 10:15 AM

Has the world gone completely mad I wonder? The Nobel Peace Prize for a man whose abortion agenda borders on infanticide? Never mind that his failed war policy is now threatening an escalation of the Afghanistan conflict into Pakistan turning a once friendly nation into an enemy, resulting in more and more American, British and German soldiers coming home in body bags.....




Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/ameri...ze-1909706.html


US President Barack Obama has been awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.
The Nobel Committee said he was awarded it for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples".
There were a record 205 nominations for the prize this year which also included French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
The winner was chosen by a committee of five people elected by the Norwegian Parliament and will receive a gold medal, a diploma and 10 million Swedish crowns (€975,000).
The award ceremony will take place in Oslo on December 10.


-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#13 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 October 2009 - 01:08 PM

View PostYaeger, on Oct 9 2009, 11:15 AM, said:

Has the world gone completely mad I wonder? The Nobel Peace Prize for a man whose abortion agenda borders on infanticide? Never mind that his failed war policy is now threatening an escalation of the Afghanistan conflict into Pakistan turning a once friendly nation into an enemy, resulting in more and more American, British and German soldiers coming home in body bags.....




Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/ameri...ze-1909706.html


US President Barack Obama has been awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.
The Nobel Committee said he was awarded it for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples".
There were a record 205 nominations for the prize this year which also included French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
The winner was chosen by a committee of five people elected by the Norwegian Parliament and will receive a gold medal, a diploma and 10 million Swedish crowns (€975,000).
The award ceremony will take place in Oslo on December 10.


*Hey Yaeger/ALL,
...Wouldn't insult your intelligence to suggest that you didn't know this is the way the world's been slidding for years now. The whole idea of the 'Nobel Prizes' has been politicized to the LEFT for generations now. How else can one explain Jimmy Carter being named for the Peace Prize as well? The 'Nobel'...is anything but what the name implies. Pay no attention...it's part of our struggle and fight against the NWO, to re-take the world for the individual. Thanks again/'S''


#14 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 October 2009 - 05:48 PM

View PostYaeger, on Oct 9 2009, 11:15 AM, said:

Has the world gone completely mad I wonder? The Nobel Peace Prize for a man whose abortion agenda borders on infanticide? Never mind that his failed war policy is now threatening an escalation of the Afghanistan conflict into Pakistan turning a once friendly nation into an enemy, resulting in more and more American, British and German soldiers coming home in body bags.....

Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/ameri...ze-1909706.html


US President Barack Obama has been awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.
The Nobel Committee said he was awarded it for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples".
There were a record 205 nominations for the prize this year which also included French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
The winner was chosen by a committee of five people elected by the Norwegian Parliament and will receive a gold medal, a diploma and 10 million Swedish crowns (€975,000).
The award ceremony will take place in Oslo on December 10.


*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…Here you go folks/Yaeger. Not a lot of happy people over the Obama Selection for Da Prize.

It's such a Transparent attempt to influence 'Peace at any Cost' & World Peaceniks…that it falls 'flat on its face' with anyone who is able to Think with any clarity in these times/'S'

This transparent attempt at crafting the image of the puppet gives us a
rare glance at the power of those from whom he takes his orders.

Absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize

Michael Binyon
Times Online
October 9, 2009
The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be
met with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.
Rarely has an award had such an obvious political and partisan intent.

It was clearly seen by the Norwegian Nobel committee as a way of expressing
European gratitude for an end to the Bush Administration, approval for the
election of America's first black president and hope that Washington will
honour its promise to re-engage with the world.

Instead, the prize risks looking preposterous in its claims, patronizing
in its intentions and demeaning in its attempt to build up a man who has
barely begun his period in office, let alone achieved any tangible outcome
for peace.

The pretext for the prize was Mr Obama's decision to 'strengthen
international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples'. Many people will
point out that, while the President has indeed promised to 'reset' relations
with Russia and offer a fresh start to relations with the Muslim world,
there is little so far to show for his fine words.

The choice of Dr Henry Kissinger and Mr Le Duc Tho as joint winners of
the Nobel peace prize continued to provoke criticism today

East-West relations are little better than they were six months ago, and
any change is probably due largely to the global economic downturn; and
America's vaunted determination to re-engage with the Muslim world has
failed to make any concrete progress towards ending the conflict between the
Israelis and the Palestinians.

There is a further irony in offering a peace prize to a president whose
principal preoccupation at the moment is when and how to expand the war in
Afghanistan.

The spectacle of Mr Obama mounting the podium in Oslo to accept a prize
that once went to Nelson Mandela, Aung San Suu Kyi and Mother Theresa would
be all the more absurd if it follows a White House decision to send up to 40
000 more US troops to Afghanistan. However just such a war may be deemed in
Western eyes, Muslims would not be the only group to complain that peace is
hardly compatible with an escalation in hostilities.

The Nobel committee has made controversial awards before. Some have
appeared to reward hope rather than achievement: the 1976 prize for the two
peace campaigners in Northern Ireland, Betty Williams and Mairead Corrigan,
was clearly intended to send a signal to the two battling communities in
Ulster. But the political influence of the two winners turned out, sadly, to
be negligible.

In the Middle East, the award to Menachem Begin of Israel and Anwar
Sadat of Egypt in 1978 also looks, in retrospect, as naive as the later
award to Yassir Arafat, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin — although it could
be argued that both the Camp David and Oslo accords, while not bringing
peace, were at least attempts to break the deadlock.

Mr Obama's prize is more likely, however, to be compared with the most
contentious prize of all: the 1973 prize to Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho
for their negotiations to end the Vietnam war. Dr Kissinger was branded a
warmonger for his support for the bombing campaign in Cambodia; and the
Vietnamese negotiator was subsequently seen as a liar whose government never
intended to honour a peace deal but was waiting for the moment to attack
South Vietnam.

Mr Obama becomes the third sitting US President to receive the prize.
The committee said today that he had 'captured the world's attention'. It is
certainly true that his energy and aspirations have dazzled many of his
supporters. Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.


#15 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 09 October 2009 - 07:36 PM

View Postskylark, on Oct 9 2009, 02:08 PM, said:

*Hey Yaeger/ALL,
...Wouldn't insult your intelligence to suggest that you didn't know this is the way the world's been slidding for years now. The whole idea of the 'Nobel Prizes' has been politicized to the LEFT for generations now. How else can one explain Jimmy Carter being named for the Peace Prize as well? The 'Nobel'...is anything but what the name implies. Pay no attention...it's part of our struggle and fight against the NWO, to re-take the world for the individual. Thanks again/'S''

Indeed, the Kenyan-born Indonesian fraudster posing as U.S. president is in good to best company here. Arafat , Gore and other borderline commies got a Nobel Peace Prize, too. Who knows, maybe Barry will eventually get an Oscar as well for having the best fake birth certificate in the universe.....

-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#16 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 October 2009 - 12:47 AM

View Postskylark, on Oct 9 2009, 06:48 PM, said:

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…Here you go folks/Yaeger. Not a lot of happy people over the Obama Selection for Da Prize.

It's such a Transparent attempt to influence 'Peace at any Cost' & World Peaceniks…that it falls 'flat on its face' with anyone who is able to Think with any clarity in these times/'S'

This transparent attempt at crafting the image of the puppet gives us a
rare glance at the power of those from whom he takes his orders.

Absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize

Michael Binyon
Times Online
October 9, 2009
The award of this year's Nobel peace prize to President Obama will be
met with widespread incredulity, consternation in many capitals and probably
deep embarrassment by the President himself.
Rarely has an award had such an obvious political and partisan intent.

It was clearly seen by the Norwegian Nobel committee as a way of expressing
European gratitude for an end to the Bush Administration, approval for the
election of America's first black president and hope that Washington will
honour its promise to re-engage with the world.

Instead, the prize risks looking preposterous in its claims, patronizing
in its intentions and demeaning in its attempt to build up a man who has
barely begun his period in office, let alone achieved any tangible outcome
for peace.

The pretext for the prize was Mr Obama's decision to 'strengthen
international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples'. Many people will
point out that, while the President has indeed promised to 'reset' relations
with Russia and offer a fresh start to relations with the Muslim world,
there is little so far to show for his fine words.

The choice of Dr Henry Kissinger and Mr Le Duc Tho as joint winners of
the Nobel peace prize continued to provoke criticism today

East-West relations are little better than they were six months ago, and
any change is probably due largely to the global economic downturn; and
America's vaunted determination to re-engage with the Muslim world has
failed to make any concrete progress towards ending the conflict between the
Israelis and the Palestinians.

There is a further irony in offering a peace prize to a president whose
principal preoccupation at the moment is when and how to expand the war in
Afghanistan.

The spectacle of Mr Obama mounting the podium in Oslo to accept a prize
that once went to Nelson Mandela, Aung San Suu Kyi and Mother Theresa would
be all the more absurd if it follows a White House decision to send up to 40
000 more US troops to Afghanistan. However just such a war may be deemed in
Western eyes, Muslims would not be the only group to complain that peace is
hardly compatible with an escalation in hostilities.

The Nobel committee has made controversial awards before. Some have
appeared to reward hope rather than achievement: the 1976 prize for the two
peace campaigners in Northern Ireland, Betty Williams and Mairead Corrigan,
was clearly intended to send a signal to the two battling communities in
Ulster. But the political influence of the two winners turned out, sadly, to
be negligible.

In the Middle East, the award to Menachem Begin of Israel and Anwar
Sadat of Egypt in 1978 also looks, in retrospect, as naive as the later
award to Yassir Arafat, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin — although it could
be argued that both the Camp David and Oslo accords, while not bringing
peace, were at least attempts to break the deadlock.

Mr Obama's prize is more likely, however, to be compared with the most
contentious prize of all: the 1973 prize to Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho
for their negotiations to end the Vietnam war. Dr Kissinger was branded a
warmonger for his support for the bombing campaign in Cambodia; and the
Vietnamese negotiator was subsequently seen as a liar whose government never
intended to honour a peace deal but was waiting for the moment to attack
South Vietnam.

Mr Obama becomes the third sitting US President to receive the prize.
The committee said today that he had 'captured the world's attention'. It is
certainly true that his energy and aspirations have dazzled many of his
supporters. Sadly, it seems they have so bedazzled the Norwegians that they
can no longer separate hopes from achievement. The achievements of all
previous winners have been diminished.

*'Sweeps' NOTE:

…Still looking for something to fight for? This is…yet another…Obama and friends 'remaking us' effort. If the following doesn't 'Do it to you', I'm afraid you're HOPELESS. Time to get 'pissed off' and bear arms…in the streets. Get active, get horrified, and get busy against 'this form of government' BS. Think it is time…to go after these 'Sunstein' types…and I mean with extreme prejudice/'S'

Holy jumping fright!! Can you believe this?? One of Obama's czars says,
"The state owns the rights to body parts of people who are dead or in
certain hopeless conditions, and it can remove their organs without asking
anyone's permission."


So this guy believes the government OWNs US??!!!!
Yeah, well, we know they think they do. They are in for a rude awakening.
Anyway, we know what this article is trying to justify...the recent exposure
of the rabbis harvesting and selling organs from Palestinians and Africans
on the black market.

CZAR WARS
Sunstein: Take organs from 'helpless patients'
'Though it may sound grotesque, routine removal would save lives'

President Obama's newly confirmed regulatory czar defended the
possibility of removing organs from terminally ill patients without their
permission.

Cass Sunstein also has strongly pushed for the removal of organs from
deceased individuals who did not explicitly consent to becoming organ donors

In his 2008 book, "Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and
Happiness," Sunstein and co-author Richard Thaler discussed multiple legal
scenarios regarding organ donation. One possibility presented in the book,
termed by Sunstein as "routine removal," posits that "the state owns the
rights to body parts of people who are dead or in certain hopeless
conditions, and it can remove their organs without asking anyone's
permission."

"Though it may sound grotesque, routine removal is not impossible to defend,
wrote Sunstein. "In theory, it would save lives, and it would do so without
intruding on anyone who has any prospect for life."
Sunstein continued: "Although this approach is not used comprehensively by
any state, many states do use the rule for corneas (which can be
transplanted to give some blind patients sight). In some states, medical
examiners performing autopsies are permitted to remove corneas without
asking anyone's permission."

Sunstein's example of medical examiners removing corneas, however, applies
only to patients who are already declared deceased.

After defending the position, Sunstein conceded the "routine removal"
approach "violates a generally accepted principle, which is that within
broad limits, individuals should be able to decide what is to be done with
and to their bodies."

Still, Sunstein did not add that the removal of organs from a living
individual should be banned.

Also in the same book, CNS News previously noted Sunstein argued for
removing organs from deceased patients who are not registered as organ
donors, a policy not without precedent. Spain and some European Union
countries have been debating accepting a law of implied consent.
Writes Sunstein: "A policy that can pass libertarian muster by our standards
is called presumed consent."

"Presumed consent preserves freedom of choice, but it is different from
explicit consent because it shifts the default rule. Under this policy, all
citizens would be presumed to be consenting donors, but they would have the
opportunity to register their unwillingness to donate, and they could do so
easily. We want to underline the word easily, because the harder it is to
register your unwillingness to participate, the less libertarian the policy
becomes."

Sunstein continues: "Although presumed consent is an extremely effective way
to increase the supply of organs available for transplant, it may not be an
easy sell politically. Some will object to the idea of 'presuming' anything
when it comes to such a sensitive matter. We are not sure that these
objections are convincing, but this is surely a domain in which forced
choosing, or what is referred to in this domain as mandated choice, has
considerable appeal."

Sunstein advocates making it mandatory for all citizens to register either
as an organ donor or as unwilling to donate their organs.

"Mandated choice could be implemented through a simple addition to the
driver's license registration scheme used in many states. With mandated
choice, renewal of your driver's license would be accompanied by a
requirement that you check a box stating your organ donation preferences.
Your application would not be accepted unless you had checked one of the
boxes. The options might include 'yes, willing to donate' and 'no, unwilling
to donate.'"


#17 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 15 October 2009 - 11:04 PM

Cass Sunstein is yet another player behind the scenes in the Obamination freak show. More about Sunstein here:


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/0...cable_idea.html


P.S. "Still, Sunstein did not add that the removal of organs from a living
individual should be banned". This doesn't surprises me at all when one considers that Barack Hussein Obama the long legged mack daddy want to expand abortion laws to include infanticide. Obama is a cross between Stalin and Hitler and Sunstein is the new Dr. Mengele.




-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#18 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 16 October 2009 - 11:00 PM

Just received this circular letter in my E-mail. Barack Hussein Obama, fake U.S. President but real Kenyan-born illegal alien posing as U.S. citizen, is well known for his desire to eradicate the 2nd Amendment. But now he and his commufascist henchmen are targeting the 1st Amendment as well.

October 15, 2009

Dear Patriot:

Please take your time and read this email carefully.

Because if a bill quietly sneaking its way through Congress passes, an email like this could be the last non-government message to ever hit your inbox.

In fact, someday you may even find yourself unable to log in to your email in the first place!

I know what you're thinking: Maybe this is just another Internet hoax.

I wish it were.

But Barack Obama and Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) want to make this nightmare a reality. That's why Rockefeller recently introduced S. 773, "The Cybersecurity Act of 2009."

Initial cosponsors include Senators Evan Bayh (D-IN), Bill Nelson (D-FL) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME).

You see, Barack Obama is seeking sweeping new powers to "shut down" all private internet in the event of a "cybersecurity emergency" — a vague term that the President can define at his discretion.

And Rockefeller's bill gives Barack Obama just what he wants.

That's why this expansive new power grab should really be called "The Internet Takeover Bill."

As you know, the Internet has developed into an independent sphere where 1st Amendment Rights can still be (fairly) freely exercised.

It's also become an important outlet for liberty-minded speech, cutting around the Obama-worship and corporate censorship of the mainstream media.

And we've already seen the Obama Administration's reaction to any online speech they deem "fishy."

In July, the Administration called upon Americans to report their friends' and neighbors' emails to help Barack Obama silence the "disinformation" about the Obamacare bills in Congress.

Well, now Barack Obama wants to cut out the middle man.

If the Internet Takeover Bill passes, Barack Obama can silence his dissenters directly — by ordering a shutdown of all Americans' access to the Internet.

That's right. Under this bill Barack Obama can order all non-government U.S. networks to shut down access to the Internet.

But that's not all.

Even outside of periods of White House-declared "emergency," this bill mandates that private-sector networks only be managed by government-licensed "cybersecurity professionals."

If you think dealing with your office IT department is bad now, just wait until they're federally-licensed bureaucrats.

And God forbid you like to visit websites that spread "fishy disinformation" like freemarket healthcare solutions: Passing socialized medicine could soon become enough of an "emergency" for Barack Obama to shut them down.

You know, for the public good.

Well, I know I like writing to you, and I hope you like hearing from me.

Or if not me, at least you probably like staying in touch with your family and friends, and having access to uncensored news and current events.

And that's why I hope you'll help Campaign for Liberty stop the Internet Takeover Bill by signing our Internet User's Mandate to Congress.

Today, legislation like this — built on the same statist principles as the infamous Patriot Act — has to sneak through Congress quietly.

They know Americans are no longer willing to swallow this "for our own good" swill.

And it's especially critical that Campaign for Liberty and other fellow R3volutionaries fight this power grab.

Can you imagine how easily those in power could fabricate an "emergency" on a big money bomb day for a strong liberty candidate threatening the establishment?

Or how about message boards vital to planning and freedom rallies and protests of socialized medicine?

With "right-wing extremists" freely and visibly exercising their 2nd Amendment rights at such events, no doubt the White House could declare an "emergency" and shut down all online planning.

I don't want to see good politicians lose potential millions or demonstrations of liberty extinguished. I hope you don't either.

That's why I hope you'll sign your Internet User's Mandate and make a donation right now to Campaign for Liberty to make sure that never happens.

We're going to fight this bill hard, because it's clear that the Internet is the next frontier for liberty politics, and Campaign for Liberty is right on the forefront.

So please click here to sign your Internet User's Mandate to Congress in opposition to Barack Obama's Internet Takeover and Shutdown Bill.

We need to fight to make sure Barack Obama doesn't disconnect your computer, shut down your favorite websites, or block your email.

And frankly, with Audit the Fed, Cap and Tax and socialized healthcare debates, Campaign for Liberty is stretched pretty thin.

And unlike the government, we don't print, borrow or take money by force (taxes). Our only revenue comes from voluntary contributions from liberty activists like you.

We need you to stay educated and active.

We've put too much time into building our pro-liberty online networks, websites and email lists. We simply cannot afford to give Barack Obama the power to dismantle all that at the drop of a hat.



I trust you'll join this fight to protect all the progress we've made.

In Liberty,


John Tate
President

P.S. The Internet Takeover Bill (S. 773) is threatening to "unplug" private networks from the Internet on the order of the President and dismantle the online army we've worked so hard to build.


-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#19 Yaeger

    Advanced Member

  • High Member Forum Mask
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Politics. I am a conservative libertarian

Posted 22 November 2009 - 11:49 AM

Patriotic preacher harassed by Homeland Security for daring to speak out against long legged mack daddy Obama!


Pastor Manning — Long Legged Mack Daddy Won't Intimidate Me
Pastor Manning talks about his visit last week from the CIA and Home Land Security



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzDR12i6R50
-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Martin

#20 skylark

    A Chief Ufologiist

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,376 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 December 2009 - 02:34 PM

View PostYaeger, on Nov 22 2009, 11:49 AM, said:

Patriotic preacher harassed by Homeland Security for daring to speak out against long legged mack daddy Obama!


Pastor Manning — Long Legged Mack Daddy Won't Intimidate Me
Pastor Manning talks about his visit last week from the CIA and Home Land Security



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzDR12i6R50

*Throwing in this Photo...think MOST of our guests and Members CAN Connect the Dots. I had FUN with this one anyway, despite it being quite a serious issue. Best/'S'

Attached File  CAN_I_SEE_YOU_BIRTH_CERT_PHOTO.jpg   46.94K   5 downloads