8 replies to this topic

[Seth Haniel]

Stinks of a cover-up

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20100228/tuk-m...ts-6323e80.html

The Ministry of Defence will destroy all future UFO reports it receives so it does not have to make them public, a previously secret memo reveals.

[skylark]

Seth Haniel, on Mar 1 2010, 03:42 PM, said:

Stinks of a cover-up

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20100228/tuk-m...ts-6323e80.html

The Ministry of Defence will destroy all future UFO reports it receives so it does not have to make them public, a previously secret memo reveals.

*Yep Seth,
...Heard that all right, but wonder if it Really will be put into practice? Your recent Topic Submission below, makes the whole thing confusing...about what the MOD might or might not do. Thanks/'S'

Visit My Website

[Seth Haniel]

Bet they put out only the poor stuff - kept the best
then with new rules they will get rid of it all - no questions asked

Strange that they will be able to review /decide/etc in just 30 days
usually takes them years to make a decision

[skylark]

Seth Haniel, on Mar 2 2010, 08:26 AM, said:

Bet they put out only the poor stuff - kept the best
then with new rules they will get rid of it all - no questions asked

Strange that they will be able to review /decide/etc in just 30 days
usually takes them years to make a decision

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
….Meanwhile unlike the UK, ANZUS treaty: New Zealand discloses UFOs as U.S. hides possible ET/UFO base at Pine Gap, Australia. Interesting HUH?/'S'

Even as Lt Gen Jerry Mataparae, Chief of Defence Force of New Zealand announced on Jan. 23, 2010 that New Zealand's secret UFO files were being vetted for public release, its technical partner in the ANZUS treaty - the U.S. - remains entrenched in high secrecy and non-disclosure about an extraterrestrial/UFO facility at their underground base at Pine Gap, Australia.

The ANZUS treaty ("Security Treaty between Australia, New Zealand and the United States of America"), signed Sept. 1, 1951, appears to be key in understanding why the the U.S. government continues a mutual policy of refusing to disclose the extraterrestrial and UFO presence at Pine Gap, Australia, although New Zealand has recently announced it will release its secret UFO files.

The ANZUS treaty was previously a full three-way defence pact among Australia, U.S. and New Zealand, governing mutual security and military intelligence matters. However, the ANZUS treaty no longer applies between as the U.S. and New Zealand. One source states: "following a dispute between New Zealand and the United States in 1984 over visiting rights for nuclear-armed or nuclear-powered ships of the U.S. Navy in New Zealand ports, the treaty no longer applies between the United States and New Zealand, but is still in force between either country and Australia, separately."

In interactive UFO disclosure in response to advocacy from a citizen UFO group (UFOCUSNZ), the government of New Zealand, the third party to the ANZUS treaty, announced recently it has begun vetting its secret UFO files for public release. Yet the U.S. government continues to maintain a policy of tight secrecy over its secret UFO and extraterrestrial-related programs and files, despite public releases of UFO and extraterrestrial-related files by NATO (U.K., France, Sweden, Denmark, Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Norway), OAS (Mexico, Peru, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Ecuador), and ASEAN Phillipines) allies, as well as Russia and Switzerland.

Since 1948, military-intelligence agencies of the U.S. government have sporadically released UFO files to private parties, with 50,000 UFO files pending release from NORAD and 13,000 pages of UFO files pending from U.S. Air Force-related organizations.

Military-intelligence cooperation agreements under the ANZUS treaty, such as the Pine Gap treaty signed Dec. 9, 1999 between Australia and the U.S., appear to be a legal shield keeping the U.S. government from disclosing the existence of a vast, underground working base that the U.S. maintains at Pine Gap, Australia, which may include extraterrestrial liaison programs. According to whistleblowers, these human-extraterrestrial programs may use the Pine Gap base as an extraterrestrial rest and recreation area, as well as a possible staging area for off-planet operations both by extraterrestrial and human black budget fleet space vehicles.

According to former Command Sgt. Major Robert Dean, teleportation links between secret teleports on the U.S. mainland and the underground extraterrestrial-U.S. base at Pine Gap exist for the rapid deployment of personnel (both human and extraterrestrial) between U.S. mainland and Pine Gap, Australia.

Continues at: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-2912-Se...t-Pine-Gap-base

[jillh10]

Barsterrdzzz see its not on..its just like flicking the middle finger at us ?? BUT there is hope there is a document that says they cant do that as its illegal and we got a copy of it on alienexistence me finks ang on let me get the link here you go take a look at this

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts2000/ukpga..._en_9#pt8-l1g77

[simple simon]

They destroy so as to prevent having to disclose in future freedom of information requests - which is worse than a simple coverup. It proactively working to stifle the will of Parliament and the British people in a most nefarious way.

Perhaps an unnanounced aspect of their plans is to retain the 'juciest' of info? We can ask / allege, but who can say for sure?

Is it not also possible that their real intent is to save their asses by preventing people from learning about what they (the MOD) have been involved in in the past?

In other words, is it possible that they want to prevent people (in the future) from discovering that some of the reported sightings were not of UFO's but their own (black budget) craft?

Simon

Edited by simple simon, 04 March 2010 - 07:37 PM.

[skylark]

simple simon, on Mar 4 2010, 06:21 PM, said:

They destroy so as to prevent having to disclose in future freedom of information requests - which is worse than a simple coverup. It proactively working to stifle the will of Parliament and the British people in a most nefarious way.

Perhaps an unnanounced aspect of their plans is to retain the 'juciest' of info? We can ask / allege, but who can say for sure?

Is it not also possible that their real intent is to save their asses by preventing people from learning about what they (the MOD) have been involved in in the past?

In other words, is it possible that they want to prevent people (in the future) from discovering that some of the reported sightings were not of UFO's but their own (black budget) craft?

Simon

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…If you REALLY want to know more about the UK's Government decision to 'Not reveal any more UFO/ET reports, this below is 'A Must Read'…with many Hyper Links. Ed Komerak, is a heavy/good investigator. Give us your feedback. Some of the Links you'll find have been 'taken out' by 'persons'. This alone is very suspicious. Still there is a LOT of information and Links which will make one think and KNOW/'S'

Visit My Website

[Seth Haniel]

Will check it out from a more 'free' computer - works won't let me access ;(

[skylark]

Seth Haniel, on Mar 15 2010, 09:51 AM, said:

Will check it out from a more 'free' computer - works won't let me access ;(

*Right On Seth,
...Would like to have your assessment/comment on all this. Thanks/'S'