6 replies to this topic

[skylark]

HILLARY CLINTON-CASTAGATES WHITE EUROPEANS-FOR MUSLIM DISCRIMINATION

-SO NOW WHITE EUROPEANS ARE THE ENEMY?-

 HILLARY_ON_TIME_MAG_COVER_PHOTO.jpg   43.12K   7 downloads

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…Goofy Obama 'PIMP'/Flunky...'The Secretary Of State', Hillary Clinton (Don't even like the looks of her)…being 'righteous' and 'Holier than thou' is now calling 'The Indigenous WHITES' Discriminatory? Yep, that's her thrust. Well we deem that 'admiration' of Islam…as 'the UGLY and Despicable creature that she is. Check out the write up of what SHE wrote in HER annual report 'On Human Rights'…and View the Video. This is an outright SLAM on Western Values…and an invitation for Muslims to continue 'taking over Europe'…to begin with. Time for HER to 'GO'/'S'

**Also…JUST BELOW…are a few 'well chosen' comments from folks. Right on**

Debbie says:
March 14, 2010 at 3:51 am
You say "Throughout her career, Mrs. Clinton has been an ardent admirer and defender of Islam. On one occasion, she praised Islam for its "universal values – – love of family and community, mutual respect, education, and the deepest yearning of all – – to live in peace – – values that can strengthen us as people and strengthen the United States as a nation."
Obviously Hillary is a useful idiot.

DP111 says:
March 14, 2010 at 8:46 pm
If she were a Muslim, it is understandable and could be forgiven, but to side with islamists against those who are hesitatingly taking steps to defend themselves from the scourge of Islam, is worse.

R Armond says:
March 14, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Hi Folks. Just so that you know where I/we are coming from, we as a couple have been extremely Islamist-wise since 1995 and active in learning and putting out the word about the ills of Islamism.

I checked some of the references (above) to Eurabia but did not find supporting evidence in Hillary's 2009 Annual Report. RE: Denmark, your article says: "The contents of the report ……also decry the authorities in Denmark for continuing to provide protection to Kurt Westergaard." All I found in the report was: "Authorities continued to provide protection to cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, whose caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed in 2005 led to demonstrations in Denmark and in many Muslim countries." – I saw no condemnation of this nor of Kurt. It appeared to me to be merely mentioned without comment or condemnation.

While NOTHING the current Admin did with regard to helping Islamism achieve its goals would surprise me up to and including being found to be closet Muslims, That said, I would like to be able to back up, with legit quotes, the things mentioned.

Any supporting actual quotes and specific links would add credibility to the article and give us all "verified" ammunition to fire back at this Obaminable Administration.

As you said, clearly Islamist nations get off easy with this administration. Now, Turkey gets off on its genocide, even though the house passed a resolution officially condeming it.


*CLICK below on the 'My Website' Video Link for this Muslim friendship she espouses:

Visit My Website

WHAT 'HILLARY' ADDRESSED:

In her annual report on human rights, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton takes to task white Europeans for manifesting increased discrimination against Muslims.

Mrs. Clinton and her staff denounce not only Switzerland for its ban on the construction of new minarets but also the restrictions on wearing burqas and head scarves in France, Germany, and the Netherlands.

The report turns a harsh eye on the Netherlands, where Muslims number about 850,000, and criticizes the insensitive Dutch Prosecutor's Office for dismissing complaints over the dissemination of a series of controversial cartoons, including those of a Danish artist depicting the Prophet Mohammed, and determining that the cartoons were neither offensive to Muslims as a group nor the cause of discrimination against Islam.

The contents of the report, which have failed to capture widespread national attention, also decry the authorities in Denmark for continuing to provide protection to Kurt Westergaard.

This criticism has caused some political analysts, including Edward Hopkins, to wonder if Mrs. Clinton and the State Department are calling upon the Danes to allow the irate Muslims, who assassinated Theo Van Gogh, to behead Mr. Westergaard.

Other pronouncements in the report are equally provocative.

Mrs. Clinton and the drafters of the report censor the Austrian Education Ministry for refusing to recognize the Alevi association – - reportedly a group comprised of Islamic militants – - as either a religious society or a religious community on the grounds that the state already officially recognizes one Muslim group: the Islamic Belief Community.

They further condemn the United Kingdom for its "Terrorism Act," which imposes a range of restrictions on individuals suspected of terrorism-related activities.

"Discrimination against Muslims," the report proclaims, "is an increasing concern."

The report has little to say about the expulsion and persecution of Christians in Iran; the genital mutilation of women and children in Somalia and other Muslim countries, and virulent anti-Christian and Jewish rhetoric in mosques within Europe and throughout the world.

Nor did the report address the realization that every conflict throughout the world, from Chechnya to China, from Indonesia to India, from Afghanistan to Argentina, from Somalia to the Sudan, and from the Balkans to the Philippines, involves a manifestation of Islam.

Throughout her career, Mrs. Clinton has been an ardent admirer and defender of Islam. On one occasion, she praised Islam for its "universal values – - love of family and community, mutual respect, education, and the deepest yearning of all – - to live in peace – - values that can strengthen us as people and strengthen the United States as a nation."

On October 3. 2009, the Secretary of State visited the Igbad Memorial in Pakistan, where, wearing a hijab, she joined with the imam and the Muslim dignitaries in Islamic prayer. The service included the Surah al-Ikhlas, which Mrs. Clinton recited. This surah contains the following four ayahs:

1. Say He is Allah, the One clear of all partners and similars.

2. Allah is the One needed by all and He needs none.

3. Allah does not beget children and He is not begotten.

4. And, there is none, in any way, similar to Him.

[captain]

skylark, on Mar 24 2010, 05:06 PM, said:

HILLARY CLINTON-CASTAGATES WHITE EUROPEANS-FOR MUSLIM DISCRIMINATION

-SO NOW WHITE EUROPEANS ARE THE ENEMY?-

HILLARY_...ER_PHOTO.jpg

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…Goofy Obama 'PIMP'/Flunky...'The Secretary Of State', Hillary Clinton (Don't even like the looks of her)…being 'righteous' and 'Holier than thou' is now calling 'The Indigenous WHITES' Discriminatory? Yep, that's her thrust. Well we deem that 'admiration' of Islam…as 'the UGLY and Despicable creature that she is. Check out the write up of what SHE wrote in HER annual report 'On Human Rights'…and View the Video. This is an outright SLAM on Western Values…and an invitation for Muslims to continue 'taking over Europe'…to begin with. Time for HER to 'GO'/'S'

**Also…JUST BELOW…are a few 'well chosen' comments from folks. Right on**

Debbie says:
March 14, 2010 at 3:51 am
You say "Throughout her career, Mrs. Clinton has been an ardent admirer and defender of Islam. On one occasion, she praised Islam for its "universal values – – love of family and community, mutual respect, education, and the deepest yearning of all – – to live in peace – – values that can strengthen us as people and strengthen the United States as a nation."
Obviously Hillary is a useful idiot.

DP111 says:
March 14, 2010 at 8:46 pm
If she were a Muslim, it is understandable and could be forgiven, but to side with islamists against those who are hesitatingly taking steps to defend themselves from the scourge of Islam, is worse.

R Armond says:
March 14, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Hi Folks. Just so that you know where I/we are coming from, we as a couple have been extremely Islamist-wise since 1995 and active in learning and putting out the word about the ills of Islamism.

I checked some of the references (above) to Eurabia but did not find supporting evidence in Hillary's 2009 Annual Report. RE: Denmark, your article says: "The contents of the report ……also decry the authorities in Denmark for continuing to provide protection to Kurt Westergaard." All I found in the report was: "Authorities continued to provide protection to cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, whose caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed in 2005 led to demonstrations in Denmark and in many Muslim countries." – I saw no condemnation of this nor of Kurt. It appeared to me to be merely mentioned without comment or condemnation.

While NOTHING the current Admin did with regard to helping Islamism achieve its goals would surprise me up to and including being found to be closet Muslims, That said, I would like to be able to back up, with legit quotes, the things mentioned.

Any supporting actual quotes and specific links would add credibility to the article and give us all "verified" ammunition to fire back at this Obaminable Administration.

As you said, clearly Islamist nations get off easy with this administration. Now, Turkey gets off on its genocide, even though the house passed a resolution officially condeming it.


*CLICK below on the 'My Website' Video Link for this Muslim friendship she espouses:

Visit My Website

WHAT 'HILLARY' ADDRESSED:

In her annual report on human rights, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton takes to task white Europeans for manifesting increased discrimination against Muslims.

Mrs. Clinton and her staff denounce not only Switzerland for its ban on the construction of new minarets but also the restrictions on wearing burqas and head scarves in France, Germany, and the Netherlands.

The report turns a harsh eye on the Netherlands, where Muslims number about 850,000, and criticizes the insensitive Dutch Prosecutor's Office for dismissing complaints over the dissemination of a series of controversial cartoons, including those of a Danish artist depicting the Prophet Mohammed, and determining that the cartoons were neither offensive to Muslims as a group nor the cause of discrimination against Islam.

The contents of the report, which have failed to capture widespread national attention, also decry the authorities in Denmark for continuing to provide protection to Kurt Westergaard.

This criticism has caused some political analysts, including Edward Hopkins, to wonder if Mrs. Clinton and the State Department are calling upon the Danes to allow the irate Muslims, who assassinated Theo Van Gogh, to behead Mr. Westergaard.

Other pronouncements in the report are equally provocative.

Mrs. Clinton and the drafters of the report censor the Austrian Education Ministry for refusing to recognize the Alevi association – - reportedly a group comprised of Islamic militants – - as either a religious society or a religious community on the grounds that the state already officially recognizes one Muslim group: the Islamic Belief Community.

They further condemn the United Kingdom for its "Terrorism Act," which imposes a range of restrictions on individuals suspected of terrorism-related activities.

"Discrimination against Muslims," the report proclaims, "is an increasing concern."

The report has little to say about the expulsion and persecution of Christians in Iran; the genital mutilation of women and children in Somalia and other Muslim countries, and virulent anti-Christian and Jewish rhetoric in mosques within Europe and throughout the world.

Nor did the report address the realization that every conflict throughout the world, from Chechnya to China, from Indonesia to India, from Afghanistan to Argentina, from Somalia to the Sudan, and from the Balkans to the Philippines, involves a manifestation of Islam.

Throughout her career, Mrs. Clinton has been an ardent admirer and defender of Islam. On one occasion, she praised Islam for its "universal values – - love of family and community, mutual respect, education, and the deepest yearning of all – - to live in peace – - values that can strengthen us as people and strengthen the United States as a nation."

On October 3. 2009, the Secretary of State visited the Igbad Memorial in Pakistan, where, wearing a hijab, she joined with the imam and the Muslim dignitaries in Islamic prayer. The service included the Surah al-Ikhlas, which Mrs. Clinton recited. This surah contains the following four ayahs:

1. Say He is Allah, the One clear of all partners and similars.

2. Allah is the One needed by all and He needs none.

3. Allah does not beget children and He is not begotten.

4. And, there is none, in any way, similar to Him.

-Hey, good one,
-AND 'DITTO'.
-Guess the Link from the 'Forum' Topic below would be befitting at this point. Maybe 'Hillary' should read it and gather it in. But, doubt she would 'get it' or benefit from it in the slightist. Nut Case does fit her-Captain

Visit My Website

[simple simon]

To further show her approval of Islam she should wear the overall clothing (Burka? Hajib?) with the thin slit for eyes.

I accept that many Islamic ladies see this type of outerwear as protecting their modesty, from lusty male eyes, but I suspect that its origins has nothing to do with this, nor religion, but rather in weather protection in a climate where sandstorms sometimes happened. When its very windy fine grains of sand on the bare flesh can hurt!

Its not that have anything against such clothing, as people should be free to wear what they want, but I am against it being imposed by men on women who would prefer to dress differently - as is often the situation. Indeed, men who do this should be flogged. What women wear is none of their business.

I am very much in favour of people being treated equally (including across the gender divide) so see nothing wrong with men wearing these full-body robes and head coverings too. Alas, it seems that they only time men do dress this way is when they are intending to do something 'naughty', such as rob a bank, or become 'martyrs' in a suicide bombing and don't want people around them to see their body belt full of explosives.

Simon

[skylark]

simple simon, on Mar 27 2010, 08:34 PM, said:

To further show her approval of Islam she should wear the overall clothing (Burka? Hajib?) with the thin slit for eyes.

I accept that many Islamic ladies see this type of outerwear as protecting their modesty, from lusty male eyes, but I suspect that its origins has nothing to do with this, nor religion, but rather in weather protection in a climate where sandstorms sometimes happened. When its very windy fine grains of sand on the bare flesh can hurt!

Its not that have anything against such clothing, as people should be free to wear what they want, but I am against it being imposed by men on women who would prefer to dress differently - as is often the situation. Indeed, men who do this should be flogged. What women wear is none of their business.

I am very much in favour of people being treated equally (including across the gender divide) so see nothing wrong with men wearing these full-body robes and head coverings too. Alas, it seems that they only time men do dress this way is when they are intending to do something 'naughty', such as rob a bank, or become 'martyrs' in a suicide bombing and don't want people around them to see their body belt full of explosives.

Simon

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
… Danish Immigration Requirements, re Muslims- Very interesting read Below. And yes Simon, in full agreement on your comments. Thanks/'S'

**Australia is rushing towards the same problems as Denmark. Once our Muslim population gets to 2% we will face the same threats.

Canada, & Australia, & the U.S. could learn a lot from Denmark.
I think they have a very logical immigration system
SALUTE to Denmark... This could very well happen here on our Continent....

Susan MacAllen is a contributing editor for FamilySecurityMatters.org…Salute the Danish Flag - it's a Symbol of Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen

In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants.

The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism won in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time.

The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.

Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?

By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.

An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted accurately that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:

'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.' 'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.'

'Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.'

'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem' 'Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.'

It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and Canada .: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who as a teenager had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.

In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. ( Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of 'racism' by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.)

If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test : You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't.

In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system as it existed was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. 'We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration.

The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,' he said. A large thorn in the side of Denmark's imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, 'The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference,' Hvilshoj says, 'There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come.' And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in…'In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech.'

Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.

The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.

Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law.

And meanwhile, Canadians clamour for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Australia and in Canada and in the US look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history

[skylark]

skylark, on Mar 24 2010, 06:06 PM, said:

HILLARY CLINTON-CASTAGATES WHITE EUROPEANS-FOR MUSLIM DISCRIMINATION

-SO NOW WHITE EUROPEANS ARE THE ENEMY?-

HILLARY_...ER_PHOTO.jpg

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…Goofy Obama 'PIMP'/Flunky...'The Secretary Of State', Hillary Clinton (Don't even like the looks of her)…being 'righteous' and 'Holier than thou' is now calling 'The Indigenous WHITES' Discriminatory? Yep, that's her thrust. Well we deem that 'admiration' of Islam…as 'the UGLY and Despicable creature that she is. Check out the write up of what SHE wrote in HER annual report 'On Human Rights'…and View the Video. This is an outright SLAM on Western Values…and an invitation for Muslims to continue 'taking over Europe'…to begin with. Time for HER to 'GO'/'S'

**Also…JUST BELOW…are a few 'well chosen' comments from folks. Right on**

Debbie says:
March 14, 2010 at 3:51 am
You say "Throughout her career, Mrs. Clinton has been an ardent admirer and defender of Islam. On one occasion, she praised Islam for its "universal values – – love of family and community, mutual respect, education, and the deepest yearning of all – – to live in peace – – values that can strengthen us as people and strengthen the United States as a nation."
Obviously Hillary is a useful idiot.

DP111 says:
March 14, 2010 at 8:46 pm
If she were a Muslim, it is understandable and could be forgiven, but to side with islamists against those who are hesitatingly taking steps to defend themselves from the scourge of Islam, is worse.

R Armond says:
March 14, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Hi Folks. Just so that you know where I/we are coming from, we as a couple have been extremely Islamist-wise since 1995 and active in learning and putting out the word about the ills of Islamism.

I checked some of the references (above) to Eurabia but did not find supporting evidence in Hillary's 2009 Annual Report. RE: Denmark, your article says: "The contents of the report ……also decry the authorities in Denmark for continuing to provide protection to Kurt Westergaard." All I found in the report was: "Authorities continued to provide protection to cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, whose caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed in 2005 led to demonstrations in Denmark and in many Muslim countries." – I saw no condemnation of this nor of Kurt. It appeared to me to be merely mentioned without comment or condemnation.

While NOTHING the current Admin did with regard to helping Islamism achieve its goals would surprise me up to and including being found to be closet Muslims, That said, I would like to be able to back up, with legit quotes, the things mentioned.

Any supporting actual quotes and specific links would add credibility to the article and give us all "verified" ammunition to fire back at this Obaminable Administration.

As you said, clearly Islamist nations get off easy with this administration. Now, Turkey gets off on its genocide, even though the house passed a resolution officially condeming it.


*CLICK below on the 'My Website' Video Link for this Muslim friendship she espouses:

Visit My Website

WHAT 'HILLARY' ADDRESSED:

In her annual report on human rights, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton takes to task white Europeans for manifesting increased discrimination against Muslims.

Mrs. Clinton and her staff denounce not only Switzerland for its ban on the construction of new minarets but also the restrictions on wearing burqas and head scarves in France, Germany, and the Netherlands.

The report turns a harsh eye on the Netherlands, where Muslims number about 850,000, and criticizes the insensitive Dutch Prosecutor's Office for dismissing complaints over the dissemination of a series of controversial cartoons, including those of a Danish artist depicting the Prophet Mohammed, and determining that the cartoons were neither offensive to Muslims as a group nor the cause of discrimination against Islam.

The contents of the report, which have failed to capture widespread national attention, also decry the authorities in Denmark for continuing to provide protection to Kurt Westergaard.

This criticism has caused some political analysts, including Edward Hopkins, to wonder if Mrs. Clinton and the State Department are calling upon the Danes to allow the irate Muslims, who assassinated Theo Van Gogh, to behead Mr. Westergaard.

Other pronouncements in the report are equally provocative.

Mrs. Clinton and the drafters of the report censor the Austrian Education Ministry for refusing to recognize the Alevi association – - reportedly a group comprised of Islamic militants – - as either a religious society or a religious community on the grounds that the state already officially recognizes one Muslim group: the Islamic Belief Community.

They further condemn the United Kingdom for its "Terrorism Act," which imposes a range of restrictions on individuals suspected of terrorism-related activities.

"Discrimination against Muslims," the report proclaims, "is an increasing concern."

The report has little to say about the expulsion and persecution of Christians in Iran; the genital mutilation of women and children in Somalia and other Muslim countries, and virulent anti-Christian and Jewish rhetoric in mosques within Europe and throughout the world.

Nor did the report address the realization that every conflict throughout the world, from Chechnya to China, from Indonesia to India, from Afghanistan to Argentina, from Somalia to the Sudan, and from the Balkans to the Philippines, involves a manifestation of Islam.

Throughout her career, Mrs. Clinton has been an ardent admirer and defender of Islam. On one occasion, she praised Islam for its "universal values – - love of family and community, mutual respect, education, and the deepest yearning of all – - to live in peace – - values that can strengthen us as people and strengthen the United States as a nation."

On October 3. 2009, the Secretary of State visited the Igbad Memorial in Pakistan, where, wearing a hijab, she joined with the imam and the Muslim dignitaries in Islamic prayer. The service included the Surah al-Ikhlas, which Mrs. Clinton recited. This surah contains the following four ayahs:

1. Say He is Allah, the One clear of all partners and similars.

2. Allah is the One needed by all and He needs none.

3. Allah does not beget children and He is not begotten.

4. And, there is none, in any way, similar to Him.

...AND get this, NOW SHE WANTS UNIVERSAL 'GUN CONTROL/CONFISCATION' BY THE 'UN'

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…Hillary keeps up with her DODO 'Pimping' for the Obama Regime's attempts to….not only Wipe out 'The Right To Keep And Bear Arms' in the American Constitution…but also to make the UN the governing body of the World. This is 'NEW WORLD ORDER' stuff folks…and MUST be resisted and 'SHOT DOWN'/'S'

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the UN to pass a new "Small Arms Treaty."

This is Congressman Paul Broun from Georgia.

I'm writing you to make sure American citizens are prepared to oppose this assault on our national sovereignty and right to keep and bear arms.

Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against "terrorism," "insurgency" and "international crime syndicates," the UN's Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.

Ultimately, the UN's Small Arms Treaty is designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

The National Association for Gun Rights has a Firearms Sovereignty Survey ready for you to complete, but I want you to understand just how dangerous this global gun ban is. Please bear with me for a moment.

So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.

But looking at previous versions of the UN "Small Arms Treaty," you and I can get a good idea of what's likely in the works.

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN "Small Arms Treaty" would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:

*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL "unauthorized" civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.

I'm sure I don't have to tell you that this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

Ever since its founding almost 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.

To the petty dictators and one-worlders who control the UN, the U.S. isn't a "shining city on a hill" -- it's an affront to their grand totalitarian designs for the globe.

These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they'll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide oppressive power they crave.

And the UN's apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.

[skylark]

skylark, on Mar 31 2010, 09:56 AM, said:

...AND get this, NOW SHE WANTS UNIVERSAL 'GUN CONTROL/CONFISCATION' BY THE 'UN'

*'Sweeps' NOTE:
…Hillary keeps up with her DODO 'Pimping' for the Obama Regime's attempts to….not only Wipe out 'The Right To Keep And Bear Arms' in the American Constitution…but also to make the UN the governing body of the World. This is 'NEW WORLD ORDER' stuff folks…and MUST be resisted and 'SHOT DOWN'/'S'

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the UN to pass a new "Small Arms Treaty."

This is Congressman Paul Broun from Georgia.

I'm writing you to make sure American citizens are prepared to oppose this assault on our national sovereignty and right to keep and bear arms.

Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against "terrorism," "insurgency" and "international crime syndicates," the UN's Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.

Ultimately, the UN's Small Arms Treaty is designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

The National Association for Gun Rights has a Firearms Sovereignty Survey ready for you to complete, but I want you to understand just how dangerous this global gun ban is. Please bear with me for a moment.

So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.

But looking at previous versions of the UN "Small Arms Treaty," you and I can get a good idea of what's likely in the works.

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN "Small Arms Treaty" would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:

*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL "unauthorized" civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.

I'm sure I don't have to tell you that this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

Ever since its founding almost 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.

To the petty dictators and one-worlders who control the UN, the U.S. isn't a "shining city on a hill" -- it's an affront to their grand totalitarian designs for the globe.

These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they'll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide oppressive power they crave.

And the UN's apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.

*OK, DON'T SAY I DIDN'T WARN YOU ALL...FOR MONTHS :
*'Sweeps' NOTE:
...Here's what's happening now folks. Time to 'take it to the streets'/'S'

On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a
plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration
intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US
citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign
nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama
administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal
legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these
international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun
laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been
developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and
individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are
designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of
all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and
methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd
Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.

Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend
to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new
gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State,
Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and
foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?
What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in
the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find
that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and
ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up
another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits
any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another
morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US
citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government
collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.
THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.

As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama
administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.
Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday
and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms
sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said
gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement
released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former
President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a
treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

*Below is the Link:

Visit My Website

[Yaeger]

I don't want to play the race card, but the establishment in the U.S. and elsewhere seems to be targeting white people more than any other ethnic groups. If the Blacks, or Hispanics emphasise their race the liberal media applauds them for it. But if whites do the same, then it's "evil" and "racist". Double standards? I think so.